Sporting chiefs have been encouraged by Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer to exclude transgender athletes from participating in elite women’s competitions.
According to Ms. Frazer’s article in the Mail, athletic organizations have a “duty” to provide precise guidelines and adopt a “unambiguous position” regarding the eligibility of transgender athletes to compete.
She reported that during a meeting on Monday, she had spoken with representatives of several sports, including football and cricket.
“For years it was too loaded an issue to touch, despite the fact that it has the potential to make women’s playing fields far from level,” Ms Frazer said.
“That’s why this week I called together representatives from key sporting organisations, like the England and Wales Cricket Board and Football Association, to encourage them to follow the lead of other sports in not allowing trans athletes to compete against women at the elite level.”
The Culture Secretary said that “biology matters” when it comes to sport.
“Sporting bodies have a duty to women competing in sport to set out clear guidance and take an unambiguous position,” she said.
“In competitive sport, biology matters. And where male strength, size and body shape gives athletes an indisputable edge, this should not be ignored.
“By protecting the female category, they can keep women’s competitive sport safe and fair and encourage the young girls who dream of one day being elite sportswomen.
“We must get back to giving women a level playing field to compete. We need to give women a sporting chance.”
Ms Frazer gave examples of sports such as cycling and running, which she said had made “positive progress”.
Among the many lessons of the Cass Review, it has shown us that inaction and a failure to confront the issues at stake cannot be an option
Culture Secretary Lucy Frazer
“By implementing an ‘open’ category for transgender athletes to compete against those with a birth sex of male, the ‘female’ category remains solely for those with a birth sex of female,” she said.
“Everyone can take part and nobody experiences an unfair advantage.”
Referring to the Cass Review, she said inaction “cannot be an option”.
“Among the many lessons of the Cass Review, it has shown us that inaction and a failure to confront the issues at stake cannot be an option,” she said.
Last week’s publication of The Cass Review revealed that children had been let down by a dearth of data and research about the use of hormones and puberty blockers.
NHS England, which had previously discontinued the distribution of puberty blockers to children under 16, announced a review into the usage of hormones in response to the long-awaited and comprehensive report’s recommendations.